Should exchanging EMTs for other crypto-assets be classified as crypto-for-crypto or funds-for-crypto?
EMT exchange: crypto or funds?
Section titled “EMT exchange: crypto or funds?”| Authority | EBA |
| Q&A ID | EBA_QA_2024_7084 |
| Status | Answer Published |
| Published | 8 May 2026 |
| Legal basis | Article 3 MiCA |
| Source | EBA Q&A |
Question
Section titled “Question”Should the service consisting in exchanging electronic money tokens for other crypto-assets be qualified as exchange of crypto-assets for crypto assets or as exchange of funds for crypto assets?
Background
Section titled “Background”Crypto asset services providers (CASPs) will in the future provide the regulated service consisting in exchanging electronic money tokens for other crypto assets.
However, due to the fact that electronic money tokens are a type of crypto-asset deemed to be electronic money (MICAR 48(2)), and that electronic money is to considered as “funds”, it is therefore not entirely clear if CASPs would, in this situation, exchange crypto-assets (understood as EMT) for crypto assets or exchange funds (i.e. EMT) for crypto assets.
This can have an impact on the compliance of said CASPs regarding payment regulation (PSD2) since if the collection of “funds” occur for a third party (in specific cases where the CASP acts as an intermediary between holders and liquidity providers for example), then CASPs would need to either be authorized under PSD2 or be registered as an agent under the same directive.
Hence, clarification as to whether or not EMT are to be seen as funds or as crypto-assets in this situation is key to assess the overall compliance of CASPs’ business models
Submitted by: Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (France) · 14 May 2024
Answer
Section titled “Answer”Answer prepared by the European Commission
Article 3(1), point (7) MiCAR defines e-money tokens as “a type of crypto-asset that purports to maintain a stable value by referencing the value of one official currency”.
Article 3(1), point (14) MiCAR defines funds by referring to Article 4(25) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366. The notion of “funds” in Article 4(25) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 includes “electronic money”. Article 48(2) MiCAR provides that e-money tokens are to be deemed electronic money.
However, although e-money tokens are to be deemed electronic money pursuant to Article 48(2) MiCAR, and therefore be considered funds, they are defined, in Article 3(1), point 7 MiCAR, as a type of crypto-asset and should therefore be considered as such for the purpose of interpreting them within the scope of crypto-asset services governed by MiCAR.
The answers clarify provisions already contained in the applicable legislation. They do not extend in any way the rights and obligations deriving from such legislation nor do they introduce any additional requirements for the concerned operators and competent authorities. The answers are merely intended to assist natural or legal persons, including competent authorities and Union institutions and bodies in clarifying the application or implementation of the relevant legal provisions. Only the Court of Justice of the European Union is competent to authoritatively interpret Union law.
Source: EBA Single Rulebook Q&A